From the perspective of public historiography, public interpretation of the past is a way of integrating anthropology and sociology into the study of history, focusing on issues such as collective public memory, national emotions and spatial memory, with an eye towards cultural history and history at the micro level, which, when sifted and integrated, can be used as a method of producing storytelling in relation to the process of urban transformation. The study of history as a scholar is often referred to as 'historical research', which aims to explore the patterns of human history through the fog of its appearance.
Public interpretation of history, on the other hand, is often related to issues of self-identity formation, family history construction and civil society participation. As a new historiographical paradigm, public history attempts to break down the barriers between elite and public writing, reflecting a crossover and fusion between the two. This is reflected in the two core issues of public history: 'public processes' and 'public space', and in the three basic areas of public history: 'history of the public, history written for the public, and history written by the public'. "The first of these three areas, the history of the masses, the history written for the masses and the history written by the masses. The first of these three areas involves a shift in the subject matter of history from what is called the history of important people and their 'major events' to the history of the lives of ordinary people, social history and cultural history.
According to Peter Burke, "they saw themselves as responding to the shortcomings of previous approaches to historical research, particularly the exclusion of ordinary people from cultural history"; the second area involved a shift from the involvement of elites and professionals to the popularisation and presentation of history to the general public, with public historians very keen on the popularisation and education of history writing. Public historians are keen to popularise and educate the public, calling on them to write their own history, that of their family or community.
For different groups in society are required to participate in the process of industrial heritage and urban regeneration, according to the successful experience of the watch cities in applying for cultural heritage, firstly the government organises the planning and development, playing the leading role of the government, realising the policy making, management and implementation, safeguarding the public interest, while enterprises and watch making enterprises cooperate, on the one hand the government can improve the influence of the enterprises, get the support of the government and bring more economic benefits, on the other hand the government can operate the planning to protect the watch cities as industrial heritage features, use them as resources for urban development, give full play to cultural, economic and social benefits, and coordinate the interests of the government, enterprises and the resident public.